![]() If doing and understanding science can show this sundering of the sublime from the beautiful to be in error, science also gives evidence of transcendence. Scholarship in theological aesthetics has recently argued that the modern and postmodern elevation of the sublime over beauty is merely a preference that reveals a bias against transcendence-against God. This linkage of beauty in science with truth and the sublime runs counter to most aesthetic theory since Kant. Fourth, where beauty is perceived, feelings of the sublime often also follow upon further contemplation. Third, the search for beauty often guides scientists in their work. Second, science discovers beauty and the sublime in the theories that are developed to explain natural phenomena. First, science reveals beauty and the sublime in natural phenomena. The aesthetic phenomena considered here are as follows. If the Creator is an artist, how and why natural scientists study the divine art work can be understood using theological aesthetics and the philosophy of art. ![]() The various aesthetic phenomena found repeatedly in the scientific enterprise stem from the role of God as artist.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |